No, not in that way. I am officially out of the Republican party. So what did it? Well, the straw that broke the camel's back for me was the GOP's shameful treatment of Ron Paul, and by extension all of his followers (which includes me!) Why should I be part of a political party that actively campaigns against the things I hold dear? That's just stupid - right?
So I am now a registered Libertarian. It was only a matter of time anyway. I've been attracted to the Libertarian party ever since I read the voter's pamphlet entry by the Libertarian candidate for President back in 2000 (who I voted for by the way). He said (paraphrasing) "we have a Department of Transportation that doesn't transport anything, a Department of Energy that produces no energy, a Department of Agriculture that produces no crops..." well, you get the idea. All of these government agencies tend to get in the way of the producers who want to transport things, and give us energy and food.
Now, I don't agree with everything the Libertarians believe (I am decidedly pro-life) but I agree with way more Libertarian ideals than Republican ideals (do they have any?)
So that's it. 34 years (plus or minus) as a Republican. Seems weird. I think I'll get used to it though.
Showing posts with label spending cuts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spending cuts. Show all posts
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Thursday, November 17, 2011
On "Spending Cuts"
Right now the congressional "super committee" is negotiating over a series of (what Washington calls) "spending cuts". What they won't tell you is that these are not cuts at all - they are reductions in the growth of government.
The truth is that even the "deepest" cuts being negotiated would cut less (far less as a matter of fact) than a simple spending freeze!!!
They are negotiating an estimated $1.2 trillion in spending reductions over the next ten years - a period in which government spending will automatically grow by somewhere around $6 trillion!!! So a $1.2 trillion "cut" is actually a $4.8 trillion increase in spending! By this logic, a spending freeze would be a 6 trillion dollar cut!!!
No wonder nothing gets done in Washington!
The truth is that even the "deepest" cuts being negotiated would cut less (far less as a matter of fact) than a simple spending freeze!!!
They are negotiating an estimated $1.2 trillion in spending reductions over the next ten years - a period in which government spending will automatically grow by somewhere around $6 trillion!!! So a $1.2 trillion "cut" is actually a $4.8 trillion increase in spending! By this logic, a spending freeze would be a 6 trillion dollar cut!!!
No wonder nothing gets done in Washington!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)