Saturday, December 11, 2021

The Ivermectin Gospel

Most people think that "gospel" means "truth" but the actual meaning is "good news".

This is a collection of positive articles about ivermectin and its use against Covid-19.  God knows there's enough negative articles out there so this is my attempt to balance that out.

For the science behind ivermectin, see my original Ivermectin vs. Covid page.

December 2021


October 2021


September 2021




August 2021









July 2021










 





June 2021






 



























May 2021
























 








 


 


 

 

 



















 
 
 
 
 

April 2021   


 
 

Defensor, Marcoleta to distribute Ivermectin ‘to those in dire need of drug’

Two more hospitals granted limited use of ivermectin vs COVID-19
 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 

March 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 

 


 
 
 
 
 


 





 
 
 
 
 

 
 


 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
February 2021

 
 




 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 



 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 




 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

January 2021         


 
 
 


 
 


 




 


 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 

 
 


 

 



 

 
 
 
 


 
 




 
 

December 2020 

 
 



 
 
 

 
 
 
 





 

 

 










November 2020  



 
 

Benha University Breakthrough: Randomized Controlled Trial Shows Ivermectin Effective for Treating COVID-19 & as Prophylaxis

October 2020 

MedinCell Initiates the First Clinical Trial of Its Covid-19 Prevention Program 

New Proteomics Analysis May Show How Ivermectin Fights COVID-19

Peer-Reviewed Results of Bangladesh Medical College Prospective Study: Ivermectin & Doxycycline Combination Effectively Treats Mild to Moderate COVID-19


Some doctors think they’ve found a cheap, generic drug which treats COVID-19. So why hasn’t anyone heard of it?

An Old Drug Tackles New Tricks: Ivermectin Treatment in Three Brazilian Towns

Ivermectin treatment 'could bring us all together by Christmas'

Southern California Research Institute Receives FDA Greenlight for Ivermectin Clinical Trial

Ivermectin Moves Towards Mainstream

August 2020 

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/florida-keys/article245313450.html#storylink=cpy

Zagazig University Randomized Controlled Ivermectin Study Results Confirms PI Hypothesis: Drug Effective Against COVID-19

Lucknow admin to set up kiosks for distribution of Ivermectin tablets

Merck: Ivermectin Triple Therapy Protocol for COVID-19 Released to Australian GPs for Infected Elderly and Frontline Workers

Topelia Therapeutics Leading Studies to Commercialize Ivermectin Targeting COVID-19 Infection

Ivermectin Breaking into American News as Doctors Come Forward & Share Treatments for COVID-19

Ivermectin to be used for Covid treatment in UP to replace hydroxychloroquine 

Australian Triple Therapy for COVID-19: 'Wonder Drug' Ivermectin in a Triple Therapy Should be Used for COVID-19 Cure and Prevention in Victoria says Professor who Developed Peptic Ulcer Cure

Brazilian Ivermectin sales in June surpass entire 2019 figures

UP govt directs use of drug Ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19 patients, to replace HCQ 

Ivermectin tablet effective in prevention and treatment of corona - Additional Chief Secretary Health released GO

July 2020 

Dr Tarek Alam: Unleashing the potential of Ivermectin

Age-old drug to rein in corona?

Peru: University students produce ivermectin for COVID-19 patients

What happened in Iquitos (Peru)?

June 2020  

Bangladesh begins ivermectin trial in COVID-19 patients 

In Pursuit of Real-World Ivermectin Stories: Tales from Pathanamthitta 

Israeli researcher: Antiparasitic drug could 'cure' coronavirus 

Johns Hopkins to Conduct an Ivermectin Study with Hospitalized Patients Infected with COVID-19 

Bangladesh doctors claim to have found effective drug combination to cure COVID-19 patients 

Bangladesh Medical Team Claims Ivermectin With Doxycycline Clears COVID-19 

New Study to Assess the Efficacy of Ivermectin Against COVID-19 

University of Kentucky launches clinical trial to look at new ways to treat COVID-19 

Mexican Hospital Starts Clinical Trial Testing Ivermectin in Serious, Non-Critical Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients 

Mexican Federal Government Commences Ivermectin Clinical Trials Targeting COVID-19

Breakthrough Drug: Ivermectin Shows 'Astounding' Results Against Coronavirus 

Broward County Doctor Using Ivermectin Off-Label Combo on COVID-19 Patients—It is Working & Secures County Health Protocol Approval 

Tanta University PI Sponsors Ivermectin Studies Targeting COVID-19 in up to 160 Patients While Safety is a Concern for Regulators 

After 48 days of treatment, Shirley defeats COVID-19 

MedinCell: Adapt and overcome in response to the Covid-19 crisis 

Professor William Campbell, who shared a Nobel Prize for his role in the discovery of Ivermectin has been sharing his thoughts on the major developments 

Antiparasitic drug ivermectin reduces coronavirus fatality rate: American researchers 


 

Saturday, February 13, 2021

Self Organization - God or Magic?

You watch intently as the magician fans out the cards revealing it to be a normal 52 card deck. You keep a close eye on his hands as he gathers the cards back into a stack, turns the deck over and taps it with one finger.  As he fans out the cards again, you’re amazed to see that every card is now an Ace of Spades! How did he do it, you ask, what is the trick?

Any rational person knows that this is not done by “magic”. We know that there is a rational explanation, that it is an illusion, using slight of hand. We know this because we know that cards do not spontaneously rearrange themselves into other cards.  We can confidently conclude that the illusion was carefully crafted and carried out by the magician.

But what if we were able to film the trick in super slow motion and examine the card deck under the highest powered microscope and observe as the cards actually do reorganize their molecules into Aces of Spades?  Would we believe it was magic then?  Or, would we still hold that there was a trick to it and that the magician must have come up with an as-yet unknown invention to induce the cards into reconfiguring themselves?  I would certainly hope that it would be the latter!  To believe it to be magic, with no rational explanation, would be intellectually lazy and foolish.

So what of the universe and all of its observed self-organization?  What is the rational explanation for that?  Is it magic?  Or, is it carefully crafted using an as-yet unknown method?  I would certainly hope that it would be the latter, as to believe it to be magic, with no rational explanation, would be intellectually lazy and foolish.




Saturday, December 8, 2018

A Viable Alternative to Revolution

The French people are revolting against an unresponsive government that caters to the rich and marginalizes the average citizen. Revolution is happening there. We don’t know what the outcome will be, we’ll have to wait and see. It might fizzle out, it might violently be put down, it might overthrow the government. The state has all the power except for the one power they cannot control - popular opinion. Once an idea becomes a movement, it can become reality. We’ve seen it before. But at what cost? How many will die in France before that happens? (If it happens.) And then what will happen? What kind of government will they have? Revolution is a very messy, very open-ended, process.

The American government is hopelessly out of control as well. The corporations, the big banks and the rich control every aspect of it—no matter which party is in power—and we the people seem helpless. Everyone knows this, everyone complains about it, but what can we do? Short of revolution, what can we do?

When "pro-regulation" Democrats are in power, they implement regulations that help the big corporations and banks and stifle any competition from small businesses. When "anti-regulation" Republicans are in power they repeal regulations that hinder big corporations and banks and have somehow managed to foster competition by helping small businesses in some minute way. Both parties enlist the affected corporations to assess the impact on their industry and to help them draft the legislation. Either way, big money wins, we the people lose. Everyone knows this, but short of revolution, what can we do?

No matter which party is in power, we always seem to find a way to manufacture some new enemy so we can go to war and keep the big defense corporations and the banks rolling in that sweet government dough. In the meantime, the average citizen joins up, goes to war and gets killed or maimed or forever changed in ways we who have not experienced it cannot fathom. And the corporate-owned media cheerleads from the sidelines and tells us that any good patriot will "support the troops", implying of course that we must support the beholden politicians who make wars for the corporations at the expense of the people - especially the troops. Again, big money wins, we the people lose. But short of revolution, what can we do?

No matter which party is in power, the government continues to make popular things illegal and then relentlessly enforces those laws to populate the prisons with the poor people who can’t afford the lawyers necessary to decipher the laws that their comrades have drawn up. Of course the state-entangled, corporate media continually feeds us the narrative that these people, and the things they do, are evil and that we need to "do something about it", resulting in a popular outcry for more of the same. But what can we do. Short of revolution, what can we do?

We have been led to believe that there are significant differences between the two parties yet both parties continue to make government bigger and more intrusive—taking away more of our freedoms—while at the same time devaluing the dollar—taking away more of our purchasing power. It may come as a shock to learn that, for roughly the first 100 years of our country's existence, the value of the dollar remained unchanged. Yes that's right. If grandma, in 1912, said "100 years ago you could buy a loaf of bread for a nickel", her grandkids would laugh and say "grandma, a loaf of bread still costs a nickel!" That's because in 1912, the monetary supply hadn't been handed over to the banking industry yet. That didn't happen until 1913 when the Federal Reserve was created. Today, we just accept the fact that prices will always go up. Net result: banks win, we lose - again!  But, again, short of revolution, what can we do?

The 'red vs. blue', 'Democrat vs. Republican', 'right vs. left', 'liberal vs. conservative' narrative has been endlessly fed to us by the corporate media and we Americans have swallowed it hook, line and sinker. We have been duped into believing that we are in one of two camps and that everyone in our camp is "one of the good people" while everyone in the other camp is "the enemy". We, like lambs being led to the slaughter, consistently argue for one party or the other even though we know that both parties are bought and paid for. No matter which party we argue for, no matter which party we are frightened into voting for, big money wins and we the people lose. But... well you know the question.

What power do we the people have? That is the question we should be asking. We don’t have the money, and voting is useless - right? Right? I mean, voting is so pointless that most people don’t even bother. No matter which party we vote for, nothing changes, big money wins, we the people lose. If only we could do something different. If only there were some way to “vote them all out”. If only there were some alternative political parties that weren’t beholden to big money. Of course there are all the “third” parties out there but they can’t win, they have no money, no name recognition.  Heck, we don’t even know what they stand for because the corporate media won’t tell us.

But wait. Isn’t that exactly what we’ve been asking for? Political parties with no corporate donors? Political parties with no favors to sell? With no career politicians to enrich? But they can’t win. Nobody votes third party. That’s stupid, a complete waste of a vote. That’s what the corporate media always tells us. But what if we quit listening to the corporate media? What if everyone ignored the lie that ‘a third party can’t win’ and went ahead and voted third party anyway? What if we all agreed to boycott both corporate parties? What would happen then?

Well let me tell you what would happen.  If we all vote third party, in just one election cycle we would wipe out the entire House of Representatives and a third of the Senate! That’s in just one election. In three elections we would completely turn the government over - House, Senate and President. That’s in just six years! And the beauty of it is, it doesn’t matter which party we choose, as long as it's not one of the corporate parties. This would essentially create a new government, with multiple new parties, who would have to form coalitions around ideas and issues to get anything done. The same thing would happen at the state and local level as well.

Make no mistake about it, this actually could happen, we just need an awakening. If this idea takes root and starts to spread, it can become a movement, and once a movement starts, and people who are fed up hear about it, it could become a reality. We the people have this power. We still have the vote, as long as we don't waste it on one of the corporate parties! It’s something we can do. Without revolution, without riots, without mass marches, without firing a shot! It's something we can, and should, do.