Thursday, November 13, 2025
Self Organization - God or Magic?
Monday, November 10, 2025
Ivermectin vs. Cancer
This page grew out of my Ivermectin vs. COVID-19 page. While collecting links on that subject I ran across these papers on ivermectin and cancer.
I am not a medical doctor, so I will let the studies speak for themselves.
On a cautionary note, a study has found that a significant percentage of people (16% in the small study) have a genetic mutation that inhibits the metabolism of ivermectin. In those patients, side effects such as “delirium-like behavior, agitation, aggressive attitude, and altered state of consciousness” occurred. Although the mutation is not mentioned in this paper, it may document a possible incidence of this.
Papers
Cancers in general.
Antiproliferative and trypanocidal activity of ivermectin bioconjugates
Ivermectin Mitigates Lung Toxicity Induced by γ-radiation in Rats via TLR4/ NF-κB /MAPK Pathways
Ivermectin Strengthens Paclitaxel Effectiveness in High-Grade Serous Carcinoma in 3D Cell Cultures
Inhaled Ivermectin-Loaded Lipid Polymer Hybrid Nanoparticles: Development and Characterization
Ivermectin and its synthetic derivatives – A new class of anticancer agents
Ivermectin: A Multifaceted Drug With a Potential Beyond Anti-parasitic Therapy
Outcome of Ivermectin in Cancer Treatment: An Experience in Loja-Ecuador
Ivermectin Enhanced Antitumor Activity of Resiquimod in a Co-loaded Squalene Emulsion
Synergistic Anti-tumor Effect of Dichloroacetate and Ivermectin
Ivermectin: Potential Repurposing of a Versatile Antiparasitic as a Novel Anticancer
Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug
Progress in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Antitumour Effects of Ivermectin
Ivermectin inhibits HSP27 and potentiates efficacy of oncogene targeting in tumor models
Ivermectin kills cancer cells via catastrophic changes in the endoplasmic reticulum structure
Lymphoma
Antitumor potential of ivermectin against T-cell lymphoma-bearing hosts
Lung cancer
Multiple myeloma
Assessing the potential of ivermectin against t(4;14) multiple myeloma.
Pancreatic cancer
Ivermectin suppresses pancreatic cancer via mitochondria dysfunction
Prostate cancer
Integrated analysis reveals FOXA1 and Ku70/Ku80 as direct targets of ivermectin in prostate cancer
Breast cancer
Ivermectin Induces Oxidative Stress and DNA Damage in Breast Cancer Cells
Bone cancer
Repurposing Ivermectin to augment chemotherapy’s efficacy in osteosarcoma
Ovarian cancer
Ivermectin: an ally to reverse P-glycoprotein-associated multidrug resistance in ovarian cancer
Ivermectin Augments the Anti-Cancer Activity of Pitavastatin in Ovarian Cancer Cells
The Anti-Cancer Effects of Anti-Parasite Drug Ivermectin in Ovarian Cancer
Anti-parasite drug ivermectin can suppress ovarian cancer by regulating lncRNA-EIF4A3-mRNA axes
Multiomics-based energy metabolism heterogeneity and its regulation by antiparasite drug ivermectin.
Cervical cancer
Ivermectin induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of HeLa cells via mitochondrial pathway
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Renal cancer
Glioma
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Melanoma
Gastric cancer
Liver cancer
Dysregulated YAP1/TAZ and TGF-β signaling mediate hepatocarcinogenesis in Mob1a/1b-deficient mice
Leukemia
Ivermectin and dexamethasone combination induces apoptosis in SUP-B15 cell line
Colon cancer
Bladder cancer
Ivermectin Inhibits Bladder Cancer Cell Growth and Induces Oxidative Stress and DNA Damage.
Clinical Trials
Articles
Ivermectin for Parasites, but as a PAK1 Inhibitor for Autism, Cancer and Leukemia?
Sunday, April 7, 2024
The God Realm
I'm not a scientist, but as a Christian, I see the world, the universe and humanity in a different way, and things that seem obvious to me, the scientific world seems oblivious to (and vice versa). One of the things I see is the necessity for God as an explanation for the incredible functional organization exhibited throughout the universe. I marvel at humanity's attempts to explain this without God, and I am humbled at the thought of trying to explain it myself - a feat that is entirely impossible for a mortal being.
When it comes to physics; quantum entanglement, the holographic universe and the multiverse are things I've been hearing a lot about lately. These things are making their way into pop culture and becoming part of the fabric of society. They are seemingly accepted with limited explanation. To me, the obvious explanation is that God, and an immaterial world outside of space/time - a.k.a. the “God Realm” - are real and are tied to this universe.
The God Realm would be an eternal continuum, distinct yet connected to the temporal universe at every level, with the finite material universe being fully contained within the infinite immaterial realm. It would qualify as the mysterious "singularity" of the Big Bang theory - the dimensionless, timeless, single point from which all energy, matter, time and space originated. The difference being that this singularity would continually exist - it did not become the universe, the universe sprang from it.
Graphically, this could be represented by the image above: a finite hyperbolic curve - with the orange line representing our universe within the confines of space/time (blue lines) - plotted within an infinite sphere - representing the God Realm. There would be a defined beginning (red dot) and ending (orange and blue dots) for the universe, space and time.
This representation is flawed, however, in that it cannot adequately convey the properties of a dimensionless realm. It's really impossible to depict this. How do you draw something dimensionless? It would have to be an infinitesimal, immeasurable point that touches everything - a point that, if we could measure it, would measure both 0 and infinity. In the drawing above, it would be both the red dot and the infinite sphere. Our minds cannot comprehend this. A dimensional universe is the only one that can be depicted. This coincides with what we observe now: it appears as if only the material universe exists, but at the same time we are starting to recognize that something else is required.
This "something" is God himself. For the God Realm is not an empty realm: the omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent God is the substance and essence of it. And, the realm is a spiritual place with spiritual beings and spiritual laws, all of which also sprang forth from God. For God is the Eternal Constant, the One, the Singularity from which all creation sprang forth. He is the timeless, dimensionless, ‘infinite zero', that cannot be measured or comprehended; the Truth, the explanation for everything.
Science, of course, cannot measure the immeasurable, it cannot quantify the unquantifiable, nor can it comprehend the incomprehensible. So what does science do? It ignores those things and attempts to make sense of the universe without appealing to "nonsense". Perhaps this is why science is limited in its understanding and keeps running into roadblocks. What scientists are slowly discovering is the need for something beyond what we can observe; something beyond what we can measure; something beyond the limitations of time and space.
Take then, for example, quantum entanglement; where two quantum particles, even light years apart, are linked together such that both change to the same state at the same time. The only way that quantum particles - separated by time and distance in our realm - could be directly coupled together would be if there were no space/time restrictions. This is mysterious and spooky unless you consider that the coupling takes place in the God Realm, which is behind the temporal universe; and that space/time is fully contained within it to the extent that "light years apart" becomes meaningless.
Next, take the holographic universe; the idea that our known universe is essentially a hologram projected from another universe with different dimensions. If this were correct, then time, space and the material realm would essentially be an illusion and all of the incredible organization we see would have to be projected like a movie from some other source. That source, would itself have to be able to account for the organizational properties of everything from quantum particles, to galaxy formation, to life itself. All of this, like a movie, would need a writer, a director, some sort of intellect at its core. Within the God Realm, the "hologram" (i.e. space, time, matter and energy) would be "projected from" (i.e. created and held in existence by) the omniscient God himself.
Then, there's the multiverse; the theory that there may be infinite universes - or "every possible universe" - existing simultaneously. Again, the fact that physicists are willing to accept other parallel universes in order to explain our universe points to the need for there to be something besides our universe. This also easily fits within the God Realm, only it would not be “every possible universe” but rather another universe with “every possibility” due to it being immaterial with God at the center of it.
One final thing: this model suggests that the material universe is not a closed system, that there is constant interaction between the physical and spiritual realms. This would mean that the spiritual realm that so many experience, and that is the basis of all of the world's religions, is based on something real; that things that are viewed as "superstitions" and "imaginary" may actually have a basis in reality - spiritual reality. A prediction of this model then, would be that evidence will point to the fact that these interactions actually do occur.
Tuesday, March 28, 2023
Ivermectin vs. COVID-19
This is a collection of papers and resources I accumulated about the drug Ivermectin and its use against COVID-19. I stopped updating this page when the subject became so politicized that even the science couldn't be trusted. The drug is safe, cheap (patent-expired), widely available, FDA approved for many uses, and classified by the WHO as "essential medicine" (but not for COVID). I think it became quite obvious that the vaccine manufacturers enlisted their scientists and media to discredit the drug. Just look at their quarterly reports to understand why.
I also became frustrated with the pro-ivermectin crowd when they completely ignored the genetic mutation that inhibits metabolism of Ivermectin (see this study for more details.) This mutation occurs in a significant percentage of the population (16% in the small study). Additionally, those who have this mutation often develop side effects with ivermectin use. (These side effects cease when use stops.) All of my attempts to bring this to the attention of the 'heavy-hitters' pushing ivermectin were met with stone silence. This was personal for me as ivermectin had no effect on my wife. I was very frustrated and confused about this until I found out about the mutation.
If Ivermectin doesn’t work for you, you may want to try Fluvoxamine.
For my page of Ivermectin news articles, click here.
For Ivermectin videos, click here.
For Ivermectin resources, click here.
While collecting these links, I also ran across numerous papers showing Ivermectin to be effective against cancer.
Meta-analyses
Clinical Trials
Completed trials
Prophylaxis (Prevention)
Hospitalized and Outpatient
Reply to “Ivermectin Treatment May Improve the Prognosis of Patients with COVID-19”
COVID-19 Papers
Papers on other diseases (for more on Ivermectin vs. Cancer see here .)

